THE STORY OF A SKILLEN
FAMILY IN QUEBEC, CANADA
By
Terry Skillen
INTRODUCTION
The search for my Irish roots has opened a door to the history of
my Skillen ancestors in Ireland
and Canada.
I have learned much Irish history and some of the story of my family�s early
years in Canada.
Work on the family tree has brought me in contact with many extended family
members some of whom I had not spoken with for many years. Through telephone
conversations and e-mail correspondence I have communicated with people in Canada, Ireland,
Great Britain and the United States
who share the Skillen name or have a Skillen somewhere in their family tree. It
has been a genuine source of pleasure to work with others on the many pieces of
the family puzzle. The work of extracting information from the hidden past is
not yet complete and so I will continue to experience the delight that comes
with the uncovering of each new piece of information about a person, place or
event in the history of my family and other Skillen families in Ireland and
elsewhere.
Unfortunately I have not found a Skillen or Kerns in Ireland who is a direct link with my ancestors
Francis and Mary who came to Canada
in 1834. What I know about them and their children comes primarily from
Canadian archival material such as census data, church records and the annual
publication of the Gatineau Historical Society.
The information I have at this time about the family in Ireland is more
speculation than fact. The Public Records Office of Northern Ireland and the
National Archives of the Republic
of Ireland have
information about persons with the surname Skillen but nothing is on record
that refers directly to Francis or Mary or their children. I have not been able
to find a connection between our ancestors who left Ireland and their parents. I have
not located a church record that identifies the date and location of the births
and dates of baptisms. Nor have I found a date and location of marriage in Ireland for
Francis Skillen and Mary Kerns. As a consequence of this gap in my knowledge I
can make only general comments about the circumstances of our pioneer immigrant
ancestors in Ireland before
coming to Canada.
The first archival reference to Francis Skillen and his family in Canada is found in the records of the Roman
Catholic and Anglican
Churches in Bytown in
1835. Francis and his family are recorded in the Canadian census of 1841.
Francis is identified as resident in Wakefield
Township, Ottawa County, Canada
East. An Act of Union had been passed in 1840 and put into effect in 1841 which
brought Upper Canada (Ontario)
and Lower Canada (Quebec)
together under a central government in the United Province of Canada. Under
this centralized government Quebec
was called Canada East. The census for 1841 was not conducted until early 1842
in Wakefield Township. The census reported that the
family had been in Canada
for seven years suggesting that they arrived in 1834. I have not found
information about the ship nor the conditions of their passage across the Atlantic. I have yet to learn of the port where they
disembarked upon arriving in Canada.
I am making an assumption that the port of entry was Quebec. I am unaware of any information that
would inform us about their circumstances upon arriving in Canada.
FAMILY BACKGROUND OF FRANCIS
SKILLEN
We know from the Canadian census of 1841 that Francis described
himself as a member of the Church
of Ireland. We can
surmise that he was baptized in that Christian denomination and that one if not
both of his parents belonged to that denomination. We also have reasonable
evidence to believe that upon their arrival in Ireland
those with the surname Skillen were from both England
and Scotland.
Some members of the Presbyterian denomination and others were members of the
Church of England who in Ireland
would worship in the Church
of Ireland. Someone in
the family could have converted from Presbyterian to the Church of Ireland.
In 1808 the Church
of Ireland was still the
state church and it had the power of government legislation on its side to
limit the influence of both the Catholic and Presbyterian clergy. It was
illegal for a Presbyterian and a member of the Church of Ireland
to marry. A marriage between a Presbyterian and a member of the Church of Ireland was not recognized in law until
the year 1845. Should a member of the Church
of Ireland want to marry a
Presbyterian the marriage would only be legal if the Presbyterian converted to
the Church of Ireland. It is possible that a Skillen
chose to convert to the Church
of Ireland in order to
marry but we do not know who that person might have been. Also worthy of
consideration is the possibility that some Skillen families were Church of
England immigrants to Ireland.
They might have settled in the south of Ireland
around Wexford or Cork.
Others may have settled in parts of Ulster
especially County Down where so many persons with the name Skillen, both Church of Ireland and Presbyterian, resided.
We have no way of knowing the actual location of the family at the
time of Francis� birth because the church registry where his baptism was
recorded has not been found. There is a high probability that the family was
living in County Down when Francis was born about 1808.
It is likely that both parents of Francis were members of the Church of Ireland
but his mother could have been a Catholic or a Presbyterian. Perhaps his father
was a tenant farmer with about fifteen acres of land. Francis would have been
one of many children born to parents who struggled to provide for the
necessities of life. At the turn of the 18th century the down turn in the Irish
economy would have adversely affected the family�s standard of living and
possibly resulted in the loss of the leased land. In the worst situation the
family would have been removed from the farm by the landlord who would then
have increased his income from the use of the land.
�
Francis� name has not been found in any records held in the Public
Records Office of Northern Ireland. Without a baptismal certificate the names
of his parents remain unknown. The same circumstances apply to Mary Kerns. We
have no proof that Francis and Mary lived in a specific town land in County Down.
We have no first hand knowledge of the socio-economic circumstances of any of
the Skillen families in Ulster.
A review of Irish census data from the end of the 18th century through to the
1860�s indicates that persons with the name Skillen only rarely lived in towns
or Belfast, the one city in Ulster. Most
persons with the name Skillen seem to have been farmers. The surname Skillen
appears as tenants in records of valuation for property. There may have been a
larger number of persons with the name Skillen who did not own or lease land.
From the recorded number of Skillen tenants in County Down
we have evidence that a significant number did have land and therefore some
status in their community. None however seem to have been affluent members of
society prior to the emigration of Francis to Canada.
We know from records of the Artists Guild in Cork that a Thomas Skillen acquired some
recognition at a local level for his talent as an artist of oil paintings. He
was born and raised in Cork in the south west of
Ireland in the early 19th
century which suggests that there may not have been a connection between his
family and the Skillen families in county
Down. As an adult he
lived with his sisters who were haberdashers in Cork. The surname is not associated with
positions of influence or authority which suggests that in the 18th and 19th
centuries few members of the extended Skillen families had more than
rudimentary if any formal education. It appears that the number of persons with
the name Skillen in Ireland
was small, rural and not well to do. However in terms of privilege in Irish
society of the 19th century the name had the advantage of being identified as
Protestant and in some cases with the established church.
After the defeat of Napoleon the Irish economy declined markedly.
The cost of goods decreased and the profit from products exported from Ireland
diminished. The large landowners who leased out their land to tenant farmers
were not making enough money from the rental of their land so they removed the
tenants, tore down the farm houses to prevent the tenants from returning and
turned the land into large pastures for grazing. The tenant class in Ireland in the
early 1800�s was without land. They wandered about without food and shelter. If
Francis� father was a tenant farmer whose land lease was not renewed the family
would have become homeless. Francis� parents would not have been able to
support their son, his wife and a child as well as their own. Francis would
have had to seek employment on a landowner�s farm or estate. In the early part
of the 19th century many landowners were attempting to divest themselves of tenant
farmers due to the poor economy. Some of these land owners assisted their
tenants to leave the land by providing financial assistance with passage on a
ship to Canada.
Another source of employment for Francis might have been a factory in a larger
town and especially in Belfast.
Given the birth rate in the 19th century we can surmise that
Francis probably had several siblings. Perhaps his father was a labourer on
someone�s farm or if he was very fortunate he might have been a tenant who
rented a few acres of land. He would have paid rent in the form of crops and
live stock. If the family lived in the Mourne area Francis� father may have
been a tenant of the Lord of Roden or a labourer on Tollymore the Earl�s estate
located near Newcastle on the edge of the Mourne Mountains.
Francis� father would have struggled to feed and cloth a large family unless he
had the good fortune of having a trade or a land holding of fifteen or more
acres. He would have worked long hours six days of the week with only the
Lord�s Day off. He may have supplemented the meager return from his crops and
animals, part of which had to be given to the land lord as payment for use of
the land, by labouring on the landlord�s estate or doing Yeoman�s duty as
required by his agreement with the landowner.
�If a member of Francis�
family had served in the Army he may have received a grant of land in Ireland. The
family would not have had to pay rent and the size of the property would have
been considerably larger than the land leased from a Landowner.
The well being of Francis family would have depended considerably
on the landlord. One land lord, the Earl of Roden was said to have rented his
land to Protestant tenants for farming at a very affordable rate. The Earl was
even known to reduce the rent in times of poor crops or a shortage. But he was
a very strict adherent to rules and he would not tolerate a breach of the rule
that he established for conduct on his estate. The tenants of the Earl of Roden
considered their lot in life to be a blessing compared to the tenants of other
land owners who maintained high rents and even increased them in times of crop
failures and shortages. Many tenants lost their land if they could not pay to
the landlord the annual fee required in crops and cattle.
Francis� father as a tenant or employee of a landlord in the
1790�s would have been required to take an oath that he did not belong to the
United Irishmen, a Presbyterian and Catholic insurrectionist movement
determined to change the laws that rendered them second class citizens. He may
also have been required to bear arms as a yeoman of the Earl.
Should Francis� father have become too old to work the land he
leased, his eldest son would have taken over the farm if it was held freely by
the Skillen family. When Francis father died his son would only be allowed to
inherit the land if the lease did not end with the death of his father or
another person named in the lease agreement. Francis sisters would be expected
to find respectable members of the Church
of Ireland to marry. The
younger sons could continue to live on the farm but they would be expected to
help their older brother on the farm without payment. Payment would be their
room and board until they were able to find employment and move out on their
own. The younger sons might have found work as labourers for a minor land-owner
or the local gentry. Given the economic conditions of the time many male members
of families in County Down would seek their fortunes in America. Whatever
were the social circumstances of the Skillen family in Ireland, the decision by Francis to leave with
his wife Mary and their two children for Canada in 1834 suggests that
Francis did not have land or employment adequate to provide for the material
needs of his family.
�
IMMIGRATION TO CANADA IN 1834
Francis and Mary Skillen arrived in Canada
from Ireland
with two children in the summer of 1834. They probably disembarked at the port of Quebec,
came by a smaller vessel to Montreal and from
there in a still smaller craft up the Grande
River, now called the Ottawa River,
where they went ashore at Bytown on the south shore at the Chaudiere Falls
or Wright�s Town on the north shore, just west of the Gatineau River.
They would have arrived thirty four years after Philomen Wright had established
his settlement on the north shore of the Grande
River at the Chaudiere Falls.
The Rideau Canal in Bytown had been completed
in 1832, two years before the Skillen family arrived. The potato famine would
not strike Ireland
with terrible devastation until 1845, eleven years after their arrival.
Many settlers had preceded Francis and his family to the Ottawa
Valley at the tributaries of the Rideau River flowing from the west side and
the Gatineau River flowing from the east side into the Ottawa River. Included
were the Americans from New England who settled with Wright on the north side
of the Ottawa River at Chaudiere Falls in 1800 and those who came later from Vermont and Boston.
English, Scottish and Irish immigrants were numbered among the early settlers
in the lower Gatineau
valley. Ira Honeywell was the first European settler on the west side of the Ottawa River in 1811.
Wrightville had been established twenty seven years before Bytown
and during the 1820�s it was the more vigorous community. There was a steam
boat link between Montreal
and Wright�s landing with arrivals every two days by 1824. Bytown, the
settlement on the south shore of the Grande
River across from Wrightville, was
named after Colonel By the British Army engineer who had supervised the
construction of the Rideau canal to Kingston.
Bytown was incorporated as a town in 1827 about a year after construction of
the Rideau Canal commenced. The canal was
completed in 1832 at which time the population of Bytown was about 1000 and growing
in size. After the completion of the canal the city was divided into Lower town
on the east side populated by Irish and French Catholics. On the west side of
the canal was Upper town populated by Protestant anglophones.
�
It is very likely that Francis came to the settlement at Wrightville
on the steam boat from Montreal.
The family probably made their way across to Bytown in a small ferryboat or
perhaps by foot or cart across the Union
Bridge which had been completed by Colonel
By to bring supplies for construction of the canal from Montreal. He would have come with his worldly
possessions and enough money to purchase the transportation necessary to reach
Wright�s Town from the Port
of Quebec. He may have
brought tools, if he had them, from Ireland. He would have brought
money to purchase the food necessary to nourish himself and his family on the
trip across the Atlantic. He would need money
to purchase the necessities of life in Bytown. He would rent accommodation in
the town or if able to acquire land on the outskirts he would have constructed
a shelter and cleared enough land for a garden. We know from an insertion in
the church registry of Christ Church Anglican in Bytown that Francis was a
labourer in Bytown in 1835.
The earliest settlers on the south side of the Ottawa
River were former English and Scottish soldiers discharged from
the British Army. Most of the early settlers in the lower Gatineau valley who came after Wright and the
other Americans were Irish, Scottish and English Protestants. Francis would be
at home among the Protestants and he might have shared the Protestant belief
that his Catholic neighbours lacked good work habits unlike the people of his
religious persuasion who viewed themselves as sober, industrious and diligent.
We can assume that when he arrived in Bytown Francis would have sought a
residence for the family in Upper town among those who shared his religion. It
seems likely that some conflict between Francis and Mary occurred regarding the
baptism of Catherine. Since she was baptized in the Catholic church in Bytown 16
months after the family�s arrival it may be that the child had already been
baptized in the Church of Ireland before the family arrived in Canada.
Francis and his Irish neighbours would have been among many other
Irish immigrants on both sides of the Grande River.
Most of the labourers who worked on the construction of the Rideau
Canal were Irish immigrants. It is quite likely that the Irish on
the north side of the Ottawa River had
acquaintances on the south side. Francis chose to settle on the north side some
time after the summer of 1835. He was still resident in Bytown on July 27, 1835
as evidenced by the baptismal record of his third daughter Elizabeth in Christ
Anglican Church. It might be that he had some experience with logging in Ireland and sought a land grant in the Gatineau valley that
would also give him access to work in the lumber industry.
Francis acquired a grant of 100 acres of land sometime after 1835.
Fifteen acres were being farmed at the time of the census in 1841. The
homestead was located just a mile or so north of Farrellton and the land grant
on which the home was located traversed the Gatineau River.
The land was in the north part of lot 3, range 11 in Wakefield
Township, Ottawa County, Quebec.
It was located in a farming community that had received its earliest settlers
in the 1820�s.